<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AL INGHAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alingham.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alingham.com</link>
	<description>The debut life of Al Ingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 08:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expectations of Worship by Al Ingham</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2010/expectations-of-worship/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Ingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 08:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alingham.com/?p=1577#comment-742</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andrew - feel free to re-distribute as you see fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew &#8211; feel free to re-distribute as you see fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expectations of Worship by Andrew Syme</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2010/expectations-of-worship/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Syme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alingham.com/?p=1577#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Yeah Bro. Excellent thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Bro. Excellent thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Site by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/iphone-site/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alingham.com/v2/?p=1352#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. And it just got better now that my site is available on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. And it just got better now that my site is available on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Site by Jamie Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/iphone-site/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alingham.com/v2/?p=1352#comment-626</guid>
		<description>iPhone 3G is simply the best phone that i have owned. It is very stylish and its nice features. I also own an N97 but i like the iphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPhone 3G is simply the best phone that i have owned. It is very stylish and its nice features. I also own an N97 but i like the iphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forgiven by Al Ingham</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/forgiven/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Ingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alingham.com/v2/?p=929#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Hey Phil, 
Thanks for your fresh perspective. It&#039;s hard to view these things with a logical mind when you&#039;re caught up in the disappointment. 

I agree with everything you&#039;ve said. It was an auction and that&#039;s what sometimes happened.
 
The more realistic/less abstract ones also take more time and more skill to complete, and when the ultimate result is going to be a less than realistic price, it is not feesible to undertake such an artwork.

I think next time, they&#039;d be better to advertise the art auction more widely and get members of the general public involved in the bidding.

Once again, thanks for your comments and for helping me pull my head back in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil,<br />
Thanks for your fresh perspective. It&#8217;s hard to view these things with a logical mind when you&#8217;re caught up in the disappointment. </p>
<p>I agree with everything you&#8217;ve said. It was an auction and that&#8217;s what sometimes happened.</p>
<p>The more realistic/less abstract ones also take more time and more skill to complete, and when the ultimate result is going to be a less than realistic price, it is not feesible to undertake such an artwork.</p>
<p>I think next time, they&#8217;d be better to advertise the art auction more widely and get members of the general public involved in the bidding.</p>
<p>Once again, thanks for your comments and for helping me pull my head back in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forgiven by Phil D-B</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/forgiven/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil D-B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alingham.com/v2/?p=929#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Hi Al

I can understand your disappointment. I guess what you&#039;ve got to remember is that the auction wasn&#039;t necessarily the forum where your art was going to be appreciated to its fullest, and therefore wasn&#039;t &#039;valued&#039; as such. General public have no idea of what comprises good art, or what it is worth. 

You could have fetched your price easily enough elsewhere, but I guess you just have to view it as having made a $100 donation, as opposed to what you considered the work to be actually worth.

The more abstract a piece is, the less people will &#039;buy in&#039; to the concept. What I observed is people (unsurprisingly) going for the more representational/figurative stuff more. This is because it is less challenging, and is more &#039;common denominator&#039;.

I can see how much time and effort went into your pieces. The problem is the greater &#039;unwashed&#039; couldn&#039;t. What you almost have to do is do a painting that doesn&#039;t take as long and isn&#039;t up to your usual high standard and then &#039;Que sera, sera&#039; (Let be what happens, happens).

Anyway. I want to encourage you to press on. You have a lot of talent. Keep painting for you, and nobody else (or at least those who you know appreciate you!). I appreciate the sheer amount of work and creativity you put out there! Your art, your music, your design.

God gave us gifts to use for his glory! And despite your disappointment he was still glorified!

Phil D-B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Al</p>
<p>I can understand your disappointment. I guess what you&#8217;ve got to remember is that the auction wasn&#8217;t necessarily the forum where your art was going to be appreciated to its fullest, and therefore wasn&#8217;t &#8216;valued&#8217; as such. General public have no idea of what comprises good art, or what it is worth. </p>
<p>You could have fetched your price easily enough elsewhere, but I guess you just have to view it as having made a $100 donation, as opposed to what you considered the work to be actually worth.</p>
<p>The more abstract a piece is, the less people will &#8216;buy in&#8217; to the concept. What I observed is people (unsurprisingly) going for the more representational/figurative stuff more. This is because it is less challenging, and is more &#8216;common denominator&#8217;.</p>
<p>I can see how much time and effort went into your pieces. The problem is the greater &#8216;unwashed&#8217; couldn&#8217;t. What you almost have to do is do a painting that doesn&#8217;t take as long and isn&#8217;t up to your usual high standard and then &#8216;Que sera, sera&#8217; (Let be what happens, happens).</p>
<p>Anyway. I want to encourage you to press on. You have a lot of talent. Keep painting for you, and nobody else (or at least those who you know appreciate you!). I appreciate the sheer amount of work and creativity you put out there! Your art, your music, your design.</p>
<p>God gave us gifts to use for his glory! And despite your disappointment he was still glorified!</p>
<p>Phil D-B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brush with the Past by Al</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/brush-with-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://day.alingham.com/?p=610#comment-51</guid>
		<description>This is awesome - the words are so fitting and challenging... hope you get to enjoy the freedom of just doing it for yourself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome &#8211; the words are so fitting and challenging&#8230; hope you get to enjoy the freedom of just doing it for yourself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lake Wairarapa by Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/lake-wairarapa/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://day.alingham.com/?p=546#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you recognised the spot... it was pretty featureless right? Except for the little stream nearby with the pondweed in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you recognised the spot&#8230; it was pretty featureless right? Except for the little stream nearby with the pondweed in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bag by vicky</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/bag/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://day.alingham.com/?p=533#comment-38</guid>
		<description>this is priceless, the quintessential at photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is priceless, the quintessential at photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gaudeamus by love of your life</title>
		<link>http://www.alingham.com/2009/gaudeamus/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>love of your life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://day.alingham.com/?p=424#comment-37</guid>
		<description>what a wonderful photo. the gown looks good on you too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a wonderful photo. the gown looks good on you too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
